ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Enhanced rehabilitation intervention improves postoperative recovery and quality of life of patients after heart valve replacement surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of enhanced recovery programmes for cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery continuity nursing in elderly gastric cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for heart valve replacement surgery.
methodsA total of 86 patients with heart valve diseases admitted to our hospital from Jan. 2018 to Mar. 2020 were selected, and randomized into the control group (n=43) with regular nursing care and the observation group (n=43) with ERAS. The postoperative recovery, rate of adverse events, quality of life, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and nursing care satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups.
resultsAfter surgery, the time to first bowel movement and the first flatulence in the observation group were earlier than those in the control group, and the hospital stay of patients in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group. The rate of adverse events in the observation group was 4.65%, which was lower than that in the control group (18.60%). In addition, the observation group obtained higher life quality scores but lower VAS, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores than the control group, and the observation group showed lower serum levels of corticotropin and cortisol and exhibited a longer 6-minute walking distance than the control group. Moreover, the nursing care satisfaction rate of the observation group was 95.35%, which was higher than that (76.74%) of the control group (all P<0.05).
conclusionsERAS can reduce adverse events and pain for patients with heart valve replacement and improve their postoperative recovery, quality of life, and nursing care satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35958475PMC9360882W4291285413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.