SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A study of extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy combined with exercise rehabilitation in postoperative patients with PCI for CHD.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Clinical efficacy comparison between extracorporeal shock wave therapy and enhanced external counterpulsation for coronary heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness and Safety of Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease with Refractory Angina Pectoris.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Roles of Mechanosensitive Channel Piezo1 in Wound Healing and Scar Formation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Attenuation of Myocardial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Cardiomyopathy Using Non-R-Wave-Synchronized Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) is a novel and non-invasive therapy for CAD. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of CSWT on CAD. Methods and results: We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Wanfang Data in October 2021. The results were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the standard Cochran's Conclusion: Based on data from our present meta-analysis, CSWT was shown to moderately improve myocardial perfusion and cardiac function among patients with CAD, which would provide the clinicians with a meaningful and valuable option. Systematic Review Registration: The meta-analysis was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/r2xf9).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.