ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
The extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection correlates with survival of small cell lung cancer patients after resection: a propensity score-matched cohort study analysis.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of the HilumDirect uVATS for small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- The role of the surgical volume for clinical outcomes in VATS lobectomy for lung cancer: a national large database multicenter analysis.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of L4 lymph node dissection during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with left-sided non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the importance of lymph node (LN) dissection during resection for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is scarce. This study sought to investigate the clinical impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on the survival of patients with SCLC. Methods: Patients who underwent resection for primary SCLC between 2000 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry. The patients were stratified based on the number of LNs dissected (0, 1-3, 4-11, and ≥12) via an X-Tile software analysis, and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between these stratified groups using Kaplan-Meier curves. A propensity score-matched analysis and a Cox regression model were used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,883 patients with SCLC met our criteria and were enrolled in the study. The LCSS and OS analyses revealed that patients who underwent LN dissection during surgery had longer survival times significantly than patients who did not. Similarly, patients who underwent more extensive LN dissection (≥4 LNs) had longer survival times than those who underwent less extensive LN dissection (1-3 LNs). However, no significant increase in survival time was found for patients who underwent the dissection of ≥12 LNs compared to those who underwent the dissection of 4-11 LNs. These results were confirmed in our propensity-matched and Cox regression analyses. Conclusions: Our study revealed that patient survival after surgical resection for SCLC is associated with the number of dissected LNs, and the number of LNs for dissection ranges from 4 to 11 achieve the best survival outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.