Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35958166›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Guideline Awareness Disparities in Plastic Surgery: A Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Jess D Rames, Whitney O Lane, Brett T Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jess D RamesDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
Whitney O LaneDivision of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Brett T PhillipsDivision of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) clinical practice guidelines were constructed to help direct evidence-based surgical management in plastic surgery. Societal member awareness of the recommendations for breast reconstruction has yet to be studied among ASPS members. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using electronic survey data from 243 ASPS members. Characteristics, including respondent demographics, practice distribution, and geographic locations, were correlated to the awareness of autologous and expander/implant-based reconstruction guidelines. Results: Of the respondents, 52% and 35.7% reported awareness for autologous breast reconstruction and expander/implant-based reconstruction guidelines, respectively. Surgeons who performed more general and autologous breast reconstruction were more likely to be aware of autologous breast reconstruction and expander/implant-based guidelines ( Conclusions: Guideline awareness in plastic surgery varies by practice composition and geography. These findings can be used to help inform more targeted educational and implementation strategies in breast reconstruction. Clinical Question/Level of Evidence: Quality Improvement/Level IV.

Identifiers

PMID35958166
PMCPMC9362863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.