ArticleTranslational pediatrics2022
Comparing of anteroinferior and posteroinferior tympanostomy tube insertion: a cohort study.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- ISOM 2023 Research Panel 5: Interventions- Vaccines and prevention, medical and surgical treatment, and impact of COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tympanostomy tube insertion (TTI) is one of the primary treatments for Otitis media with effusion (OME) in children, a common condition in children. However, there is still no conclusion on the better choice of tube position, and no relevant research has been found in the literature. This study analyzed the results of the two commonly selected tube insert positions, anteroinferior quadrant (AQ) and posteroinferior quadrant (PQ), in order to determine which is the better choice. Methods: Children with bilateral OME who received TTI in Beijing Tongren Hospital from May 2020 to January 2021 were selected as subjects. one side on AQ and the other side on PQ randomly. Follow-up visits were arranged at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The results of audiology and the tube status of the two positions were recorded and compared statistically. Results: A total of 90 patients with bilateral OME were selected. There was no difference in preoperative hearing between the 2 groups. The AQ group's average air conduction threshold was significantly higher than that of the PQ group 1 week after surgery. Although there was no significant difference in tube fall-off rate between the two groups within 6 months, it was significantly higher in AQ group than that in PQ group at 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Compared to TTI on AQ, TTI on PQ is more stable and better improves hearing, and the operation is also more convenient for surgeons. This study provides reference for a better position of TTI in OME therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.