Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957951›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and 0 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes: Risk Pattern and Outcomes on a Community Level.

Michael Braun, Antonia Kriegmair, Nina Szeterlak, Anne Andrulat, Simone Schrodi, Monika Kriner, Claus Hanusch, Moritz Hamann, Oliver Stoetzer, Martin Pölcher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BraunDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Antonia KriegmairDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Nina SzeterlakDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Anne AndrulatDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Simone SchrodiMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) at the Institute of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Munich, Regional Centre Munich, Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Munich, Germany.
Monika KrinerStatistical Consultant, Puchheim, Germany.
Claus HanuschDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Moritz HamannDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Oliver StoetzerHematology and Oncology Outpatient Cancer Care Center, Munich, Germany.
Martin PölcherDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
German Red Cross · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance of Oncotype DX® multigene assay (ODX®) in patients with 0-3 lymph nodes in a high-volume community hospital. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic HR*/HER2- EBC and 0-3 positive lymph nodes, who underwent primary surgery at the Red Cross Hospital Munich, Germany and consecutively had ODX® testing were included in this retrospective study. The distribution of clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence score (RS) risk, and use of systemic therapy were compared among patients without positive lymph nodes (N0) and patients with micrometastases or 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes (N1). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results: From 2012 to 2017 ODX® was consecutively performed in 575 (16.4%) of 3,492 women with HR*/HER- EBC, of which 553 were eligible for this analysis (N0: 60.8%; N1: 39.2%). Among the patients included, 441 (79.7%) had an RS of 0 to 25 and 112 (20.3%) had an RS of 26 or higher. In patients with RS 0 to 25 the rate of chemotherapy use was low, independent from nodal status (N0: 17.1% and N1: 19.1%) and 5-year DFS was 90.5% and 91.7% for N0 and N1 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in DFS (90.5% vs. 93.3%; Conclusions: The results of the study confirm the observations from randomized studies on the use of the ODX® in a real-world population in terms of risk distribution and patient outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be safely omitted in patients with HR*/HER2- breast cancer with 0-3 positive lymph nodes and RS <25.

Indexed as

21-gene recurrence scoreLuminal breast cancerOutcome

Identifiers

PMID35957951
PMCPMC9247532
OpenAlexW3216296507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.