Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Metabolic Reprogramming Helps to Define Different Metastatic Tropisms in Colorectal Cancer.

Ana Montero-Calle, Marta Gómez de Cedrón, Adriana Quijada-Freire, Guillermo Solís-Fernández, Victoria López-Alonso, Isabel Espinosa-Salinas, Alberto Peláez-García, María Jesús Fernández-Aceñero, Ana Ramírez de Molina, Rodrigo Barderas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Montero-CalleFunctional Proteomics Unit, Chronic Disease Programme, UFIEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Gómez de CedrónPrecision Nutrition and Cancer Program, Molecular Oncology Group, IMDEA Food Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) University Autonomous of Madrid (UAM) + Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Adriana Quijada-FreirePrecision Nutrition and Cancer Program, Molecular Oncology Group, IMDEA Food Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) University Autonomous of Madrid (UAM) + Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Solís-FernándezMolecular Imaging and Photonics Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Victoria López-AlonsoUnidad de Biología Computacional, Chronic Disease Programme, UFIEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Espinosa-SalinasPlatform for Clinical Trials in Nutrition and Health (GENYAL), IMDEA Food Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) University Autonomous of Madrid (UAM) + Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Peláez-GarcíaMolecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, La Paz University Hospital (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
María Jesús Fernández-AceñeroServicio de Anatomía Patológica Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Ramírez de MolinaPrecision Nutrition and Cancer Program, Molecular Oncology Group, IMDEA Food Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) University Autonomous of Madrid (UAM) + Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Rodrigo BarderasFunctional Proteomics Unit, Chronic Disease Programme, UFIEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience systemic metastases, with the most frequent target organs being the liver and lung. Metabolic reprogramming has been recognized as one of the hallmarks of cancer. Here, metabolic and functional differences between two CRC cells with different metastatic organotropisms (metastatic KM12SM CRC cells to the liver and KM12L4a to the lung when injected in the spleen and in the tail vein of mice) were analysed in comparison to their parental non-metastatic isogenic KM12C cells, for a subsequent investigation of identified metabolic targets in CRC patients. Meta-analysis from proteomic and transcriptomic data deposited in databases, qPCR, WB,

Indexed as

CRC (colorectal cancer)fatty acids (FA)metabolic reprogramingobesityorganotropismtropism of metastasis

Identifiers

PMID35957902
PMCPMC9358964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.