Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957854›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory prognostic factors in patients with leprosy reactions: A 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Douglas Eulálio Antunes, Diogo Fernandes Santos, Mayara Ingrid Sousa Lima, Larissa Pereira Caixeta, Meydson Benjamin Carvalho Correa, Emilly Caroline Dos Santos Moraes, Natalia Carine Almeida Conceição, Luiz Ricardo Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes Goulart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas Eulálio AntunesNational Reference Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Leprosy, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Diogo Fernandes SantosNational Reference Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Leprosy, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Mayara Ingrid Sousa LimaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Larissa Pereira CaixetaNational Reference Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Leprosy, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Meydson Benjamin Carvalho CorreaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Emilly Caroline Dos Santos MoraesDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Natalia Carine Almeida ConceiçãoDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Luiz Ricardo GoulartNational Reference Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Leprosy, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Isabela Maria Bernardes GoulartNational Reference Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Leprosy, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade Federal do Maranhão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Leprosy reactions, the main cause of neural damage, can occur up to 7 years after starting multidrug therapy. We aimed to approach the prognostic factors that may influence the leprosy reactions over the follow-up time. Methods: Retrospective cohort study, encompassing 10 years of data collection, composed of 390 patients, divided into 201 affected by reactions and 189 reaction-free individuals. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory variables were approached as prognostic factors associated with leprosy reactions. The association among variables was analyzed by a binomial test and survival curves were compared by the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results: 51.5% (201/390) of patients were affected by leprosy reactions. These immunological events were associated with lepromatous leprosy (16.2%; 63/390; Conclusions: Finally, these findings demonstrated that anti-PGL-I serology at diagnosis is the most important prognostic factor for leprosy reactions after starting multidrug therapy, thus enabling prediction of this immunological event.

Indexed as

antigensleprosyleprosy reactionphenolic-glycolipid-1survival analysis

Identifiers

PMID35957854
PMCPMC9358030
OpenAlexW4287146841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.