Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957844›Full record

ArticleBME frontiers2022

A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.

Brett Z Fite, James Wang, Pejman Ghanouni, Katherine W Ferrara

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BME frontiers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett Z FiteDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8068-2042
James WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Pejman GhanouniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Katherine W FerraraDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Palo Alto University · US

Funding

Specific and high-resolution ultrasound cancer imagingR01CA112356 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W, FOIRET, JOSQUIN · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
Imaging Modulation of Immune PhenotypeR01CA250557 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W, LEVY, RONALD · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Quantitative volumetric ultrasonic and photoacoustic tomographyR01CA258807 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine W Ferrara, Steven Poplack · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
High Resolution Ultrasound in Interventional RadiologyR01CA271309 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine W Ferrara, Qifa Zhou · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
HIFU-immunotherapy in pancreatic cancerR01CA253316 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112356NCI NIH HHS R01 CA250557NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253316NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258807NCI NIH HHS R01 CA271309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound ablation techniques are minimally invasive alternatives to surgical resection and have rapidly increased in use. The response of tissue to HIFU ablation differs based on the relative contributions of thermal and mechanical effects, which can be varied to achieve optimal ablation parameters for a given tissue type and location. In tumor ablation, similar to surgical resection, it is desirable to include a safety margin of ablated tissue around the entirety of the tumor. A factor in optimizing ablative techniques is minimizing the recurrence rate, which can be due to incomplete ablation of the target tissue. Further, combining focal ablation with immunotherapy is likely to be key for effective treatment of metastatic cancer, and therefore characterizing the impact of ablation on the tumor microenvironment will be important. Thus, visualization and quantification of the extent of ablation is an integral component of ablative procedures. The aim of this review article is to describe the radiological findings after ultrasound ablation across multiple imaging modalities. This review presents readers with a general overview of the current and emerging imaging methods to assess the efficacy of ultrasound ablative treatments.

Identifiers

PMID35957844
PMCPMC9364780
OpenAlexW4225324680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.