Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957729›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Prognostic value of absolute lymphocyte count in patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated with immunotherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Qi Zhao, Yanping Bi, Jiao Xue, Yandong Liu, Jiaxing Zhu, Songbing Qin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi Zhao *Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yanping Bi *Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jiao XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yandong LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jiaxing ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Songbing QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy has become the standard of treatment for recurrent metastatic esophageal cancer (EC), and the value of efficacy predictive markers represented by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is limited. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prognostic value of peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at baseline in patients with recurrent metastatic EC treated with immunotherapy, and to further investigate the relationship between the minimal ALC value (Min ALC) and radiotherapy (RT) parameters. Methods: The main inclusion criteria were: histologically or imaging confirmed recurrent or metastatic EC; complete routine blood test data. A total of 105 patients were included in a single-center institution, 65 of whom had previously received RT. The optimal cut-off value for baseline lymphopenia was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The prognostic value of baseline phase lymphopenia for immunotherapy were determined by cox regression analysis and the associated factors affecting lymphopenia were explored by logistic regression analysis. Results: The cut-off value for baseline ALC predicting 1-year overall survival (OS) was 625 cells/µL. The OS was significantly lower in the lymphopenia group (ALC ≤625 cells/µL) than in the non-lymphopenia group (ALC >625 cells/µL) (median OS: 6 Conclusions: Lymphopenia is associated with a poorer immunotherapy prognosis in patients with recurrent metastatic EC and those with previous G4 Min ALC after RT. RT-related parameters, especially irradiation volume, can significantly affect lymphocyte counts.

Indexed as

Esophageal cancer (EC)immunotherapylymphopeniaradiotherapy (RT)

Identifiers

PMID35957729
PMCPMC9358517
OpenAlexW4285021931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.