ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
GRSF1 predicts an unfavorable prognosis and promotes tumorigenesis in lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis and
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Heterogeneity of Tumor Cells and its Impact on Colon Cancer Metastasis: Insights from Single-Cell and Bulk Transcriptome Analyses.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Siglec 15 as a biomarker or a druggable molecule for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- CENPH overexpression promotes the progression, cisplatin resistance, and poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma via the AKT and ERK/P38 pathways.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- CMaf-Inducing Protein Promotes LUAD Proliferation and Metastasis by Activating the MAPK/ERK Pathway.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective biomarkers play a critical role in improving clinical approaches to treat lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, many existing biomarkers have limitations due to a lot of factors, requiring the development of additional biomarkers to effectively predict the disease course and prognosis of LUAD. Guanine-rich RNA sequence binding factor 1 (GRSF1) participates in multiple biological processes, but its regulatory effect on LUAD remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological importance and biological role of GRSF1 in LUAD. Methods: The expression of GRSF1 was evaluated using multiple service portals. X-Tile software were used to determine the high and low GRSF1 groups and the relationships between GRSF1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics were then analyzed by R packages. Besides, prognostic significance was identified by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Plotter. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was the main outcome of prognosis analysis. The DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) and methylations were calculated using cBioPortal and R packages. The co-expressed genes of GRSF1 were obtained from LinkedOmics, and functional networks were then constructed by R clusterProfiler. Additionally, cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assays were applied to verify the proliferation effects of GRSF1 on LUAD cells. Results: GRSF1 was significantly upregulated in the LUAD tissues compared to the non-tumor lung tissues (all P<0.05), and its expression was significantly correlated with gender (χ Conclusions: The high expression of GRSF1 indicated an unfavorable prognosis and was closely related to LUAD tumor occurrence and development, which could be used as an effective prognostic biomarker for patients suffering from LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.