Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957722›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Multimodal treatments of brain arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of microsurgical timings after endovascular embolization.

Chaofan Zeng, Mingze Wang, Xiaowen Song, Chaoqi Zhang, Fa Lin, Qiheng He, Wuyang Yang, Yong Cao, Shuo Wang, Wenjun Tu and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03774017 (Study on Benefits and Risks of Hybrid Operation in the Treatment of Complex Brain Arteriovenous Malformations), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03774017 naunknown statusnot on this map

Study on Benefits and Risks of Hybrid Operation in the Treatment of Complex Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinistry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of ChinaRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,200ConditionsCerebrovascular Disease, Arteriovenous Malformations, Complex, PrimaryArmsone-staged hybrid operation, Traditional microsurgical operation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chaofan Zeng *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mingze Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaowen SongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chaoqi ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fa LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiheng HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wuyang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yong CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenjun TuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jizong ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical outcomes of hybrid microsurgery and embolization with multi-staged procedure for patients harboring brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed bAVM patients from a multicenter, prospectively collected database (NCT03774017) between June 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided into single-staged hybrid operation (HO) group and multi-staged operation (MO) group according to the received treatment, in which microsurgeries were performed with embolization in a single setting or with multi-stage procedure, respectively. Cases were 1:1 matched between the two groups. Outcomes were compared between groups, which included neurological deficits (NDs), perioperative rupture, and proportion of complete resection. Variables associated with NDs were analyzed. Results: In total, 198 out of 544 cases were identified, including 120 in the HO group and 78 in the MO group. Sixty-six cases were matched in each group resulting in a total of 132 patients in this case-controlled study. Mean age was 29.2 years old, with 82 (62.1%) being male. No significant difference was observed in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between the two groups. There were 7 ruptures occurred in the interval between embolization and microsurgery for MO group while none in the HO group (P=0.023). This yielded a rupture risk of 4.1% per year for the MO group. Duration of surgical resection was significantly reduced in HO group (P=0.001). Compared to MO, HO was more favorable to avoid short-term NDs (3.0% Conclusions: HO is an effective setup to treat complex bAVMs with avoiding interval hemorrhage risk and reducing surgical risk. We also observed overall similar obliteration rate and resulting clinical outcomes between HO and MO.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous malformation (AVMs)endovascular embolizationmultimodal treatmentoutcomesingle-staged hybrid operation (single-staged HO)

Identifiers

PMID35957722
PMCPMC9358510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.