Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957713›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Morphological characteristics of the subfoveal choroid and their association with visual acuity in postoperative patients with unilateral congenital cataracts.

Yue Zhou, Jinghui Wang, Ling Jin, Wan Chen, Qiwei Wang, Hui Chen, Jingjing Chen, Zhouyue Li, Zhuoling Lin, Xiaoyan Li and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yue ZhouState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Jinghui WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Ling JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Wan ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Qiwei WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Hui ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Jingjing ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Zhouyue LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuoling LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Jing LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Haotian Lin *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Duoru Lin *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Weirong Chen *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the subfoveal choroid and explore the possible association of these characteristics with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in postoperative patients with unilateral congenital cataracts (CCs). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Subfoveal choroidal structures were measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging (EDI-OCT). Several choroidal parameters, including subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI), were compared between pseudophakic and contralateral healthy eyes. Then, the choroidal parameters were compared between pseudophakic eyes with a poor BCVA (>0.3 logMAR) and those with a good BCVA (≤0.3 logMAR). The performance of the choroidal parameters in detecting a poor BCVA in pseudophakic eyes was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between choroidal parameters and BCVA in postoperative patients with unilateral CCs. Results: A total of 55 postoperative patients with unilateral CCs were included. The age was 6.67±2.64 years. Thinner SFCT and smaller TCA, LA, SA and CVI were observed in pseudophakic eyes than in contralateral healthy eyes. In addition, in pseudophakic eyes, those with a poor BCVA had a thinner SFCT and a smaller TCA, LA and SA than those with a good BCVA. TCA [AUC, 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62, 0.88], LA (AUC, 0.74; 0.61, 0.87) and SA (AUC, 0.74; 0.60, 0.87) showed acceptable discriminatory abilities on BCVA. Pseudophakic eyes with TCA ≤0.594 mm² [odds ratio (OR), 8.90; 95% CI: 1.99, 39.94; P=0.004], LA ≤0.402 mm² (OR 8.90; 95% CI: 1.99, 39.94; P=0.004) or SA ≤0.218 mm (OR, 6.53; 95% CI: 1.69, 25.27; P=0.007) were more likely to have a poor visual acuity. Conclusions: The pseudophakic eyes in patients with unilateral CCs had thinner SFCT and smaller TCA, LA, SA and CVI than the contralateral healthy eyes. In pseudophakic eyes, smaller TCA, LA and SA values were associated with a poor visual acuity.

Indexed as

best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)choroidal structuresCongenital cataracts (CCs)optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging

Identifiers

PMID35957713
PMCPMC9358499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.