Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957684›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Human muscle in gene edited pigs for treatment of volumetric muscle loss.

Sarah M Greising, Joshua I Weiner, Daniel J Garry, David H Sachs, Mary G Garry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M GreisingSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Joshua I WeinerDepartments of Surgery, Columbia Center for Translations Immunology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel J GarryCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
David H SachsDepartments of Surgery, Columbia Center for Translations Immunology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Mary G GarryCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focusing on complex extremity trauma and volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries, this review highlights: 1) the current pathophysiologic limitations of the injury sequela; 2) the gene editing strategy of the pig as a model that provides a novel treatment approach; 3) the notion that human skeletal muscle derived from gene edited, humanized pigs provides a groundbreaking treatment option; and 4) the impact of this technologic platform and how it will advance to far more multifaceted applications. This review seeks to shed insights on a novel treatment option using gene edited pigs as a platform which is necessary to overcome the clinical challenges and limitations in the field.

Indexed as

blastocyst complementationhuman animal chimerasskeletal muscle functionsomatic cell nuclear transferxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID35957684
PMCPMC9358139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.