Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957507›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Clinical Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Immunocompromised Patients with Sepsis.

Zheng Cheng, Feng Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zheng ChengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China (mainland).
Feng YuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sepsis is a serious threat to human life, particularly in immunocompromised patients; hence, early diagnosis and targeted treatment are important. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) has significant advantages over traditional diagnostic methods. This study investigated the clinical value of NGS for pathogen identification in immunocompromised patients with sepsis. MATERIAL AND METHODS From July 2020 to September 2021, 90 consecutive patients with sepsis were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an immunocompromised group (n=30) and an immunocompetent group (n=60). The pathogens causing sepsis were concurrently identified using NGS and traditional diagnostic methods. The pathogen detection rates and the spectrum of pathogens identified were compared according to the method of detection and between the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups. RESULTS Of the 90 patients, 77 (86%) were positive for 1 or more pathogens using NGS, and 50 (56%) were positive using traditional detection methods. The positivity rate of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was higher than that of blood samples. Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus infections were more common in the immunocompromised group than in the immunocompetent group. CONCLUSIONS The performance of NGS in identifying pathogens for patients with sepsis is better than that of traditional detection methods, especially in immunocompromised patients. Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus infections are more common in immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsPneumocystis cariniiSepsisBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunocompromised HostProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35957507
PMCPMC9380443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.