ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
Clinical Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Immunocompromised Patients with Sepsis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Workflow with a Novel Host Depletion Method for Enhanced Pathogen Detection.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections: a prospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Microbiomes Detected by Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing among HIV-Infected and Uninfected Patients with Pulmonary Infection.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis is a serious threat to human life, particularly in immunocompromised patients; hence, early diagnosis and targeted treatment are important. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) has significant advantages over traditional diagnostic methods. This study investigated the clinical value of NGS for pathogen identification in immunocompromised patients with sepsis. MATERIAL AND METHODS From July 2020 to September 2021, 90 consecutive patients with sepsis were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an immunocompromised group (n=30) and an immunocompetent group (n=60). The pathogens causing sepsis were concurrently identified using NGS and traditional diagnostic methods. The pathogen detection rates and the spectrum of pathogens identified were compared according to the method of detection and between the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups. RESULTS Of the 90 patients, 77 (86%) were positive for 1 or more pathogens using NGS, and 50 (56%) were positive using traditional detection methods. The positivity rate of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was higher than that of blood samples. Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus infections were more common in the immunocompromised group than in the immunocompetent group. CONCLUSIONS The performance of NGS in identifying pathogens for patients with sepsis is better than that of traditional detection methods, especially in immunocompromised patients. Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus infections are more common in immunocompromised patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.