Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957478›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Novel Decentralized Blockchain Architecture for the Preservation of Privacy and Data Security against Cyberattacks in Healthcare.

Ajitesh Kumar, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Ijaz Ahmad, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Anushree, Pawan Kumar Verma, Khalid A Alissa, Mohit Bajaj, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Elsayed Tag-Eldin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Botnet Attack Detection in IoT Using Machine Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ajitesh KumarDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-5640
Akhilesh Kumar SinghDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.
Ijaz AhmadInstitute of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (ICS/IT), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, PakistanORCID 0000-0003-3974-2207
Pradeep Kumar SinghDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.
AnushreeDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2360-1426
Pawan Kumar VermaDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, Pune 412201, India.
Khalid A AlissaSAUDI ARAMCO Cybersecurity Chair, Networks and Communications Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Mohit BajajDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi 110040, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-457X
Ateeq Ur RehmanCollege of Internet of Things Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5203-0621
Elsayed Tag-EldinFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-9967
GLA University · INFuture University in Egypt · EGHohai University · CNMIT Art, Design and Technology University · INNational Institute of Technology Delhi · INSaudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) · SAThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, in a world full of uncertainties and the threat of digital and cyber-attacks, blockchain technology is one of the major critical developments playing a vital role in the creative professional world. Along with energy, finance, governance, etc., the healthcare sector is one of the most prominent areas where blockchain technology is being used. We all are aware that data constitute our wealth and our currency; vulnerability and security become even more significant and a vital point of concern for healthcare. Recent cyberattacks have raised the questions of planning, requirement, and implementation to develop more cyber-secure models. This paper is based on a blockchain that classifies network participants into clusters and preserves a single copy of the blockchain for every cluster. The paper introduces a novel blockchain mechanism for secure healthcare sector data management, which reduces the communicational and computational overhead costs compared to the existing bitcoin network and the lightweight blockchain architecture. The paper also discusses how the proposed design can be utilized to address the recognized threats. The experimental results show that, as the number of nodes rises, the suggested architecture speeds up ledger updates by 63% and reduces network traffic by 10 times.

Indexed as

BlockchainComputer SecurityDelivery of Health CareHumansPrivacyTechnologyblockchaincyberattackcyber securityhealthcare

Identifiers

PMID35957478
PMCPMC9371396
OpenAlexW4290755643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.