Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957387›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Intelligent User Interfaces and Their Evaluation: A Systematic Mapping Study.

Saša Brdnik, Tjaša Heričko, Boštjan Šumak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saša BrdnikFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Tjaša HeričkoFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-7724
Boštjan ŠumakFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-3477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intelligent user interfaces (IUI) are driven by the goal of improvement in human-computer interaction (HCI), mainly improving user interfaces' user experience (UX) or usability with the help of artificial intelligence. The main goal of this study is to find, assess, and synthesize existing state-of-the-art work in the field of IUI with an additional focus on the evaluation of IUI. This study analyzed 211 studies published in the field between 2012 and 2022. Studies are most frequently tied to HCI and SE domains. Definitions of IUI were observed, showing that adaptation, representation, and intelligence are key characteristics associated with IUIs, whereas adaptation, reasoning, and representation are the most commonly used verbs in their description. Evaluation of IUI is mainly conducted with experiments and questionnaires, though usability and UX are not considered together in evaluations. Most evaluations (81% of studies) reported partial or complete improvement in usability or UX. A shortage of evaluation tools, methods, and metrics, tailored for IUI, is noticed. Most often, empirical data collection methods and data sources in IUI evaluation studies are experiment, prototype development, and questionnaire.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUser-Computer InterfaceComputersHumansIntelligenceSurveys and Questionnairesevaluationintelligent user interfacesIUIusabilityuser experience

Identifiers

PMID35957387
PMCPMC9370954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.