ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Towards an Effective Intrusion Detection Model Using Focal Loss Variational Autoencoder for Internet of Things (IoT).
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrusion detection with HACDT-Net and TRBM-Net using a hybrid deep learning framework with enhanced sampling techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feature importance guided autoencoder for dimensionality reduction in intrusion detection systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HiViT-IDS: An Efficient Network Intrusion Detection Method Based on Vision Transformer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Adaptive Temporal Convolutional Network Autoencoder for Malicious Data Detection in Mobile Crowd Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the range of security attacks increases across diverse network applications, intrusion detection systems are of central interest. Such detection systems are more crucial for the Internet of Things (IoT) due to the voluminous and sensitive data it produces. However, the real-world network produces imbalanced traffic including different and unknown attack types. Due to this imbalanced nature of network traffic, the traditional learning-based detection techniques suffer from lower overall detection performance, higher false-positive rate, and lower minority-class attack detection rates. To address the issue, we propose a novel deep generative-based model called Class-wise Focal Loss Variational AutoEncoder (CFLVAE) which overcomes the data imbalance problem by generating new samples for minority attack classes. Furthermore, we design an effective and cost-sensitive objective function called Class-wise Focal Loss (CFL) to train the traditional Variational AutoEncoder (VAE). The CFL objective function focuses on different minority class samples and scrutinizes high-level feature representation of observed data. This leads the VAE to generate more realistic, diverse, and quality intrusion data to create a well-balanced intrusion dataset. The balanced dataset results in improving the intrusion detection accuracy of learning-based classifiers. Therefore, a Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifier with a unique architecture is then trained using the balanced intrusion dataset to enhance the detection performance. Moreover, we utilize a challenging and highly imbalanced intrusion dataset called NSL-KDD to conduct an extensive experiment with the proposed model. The results demonstrate that the proposed CFLVAE with DNN (CFLVAE-DNN) model obtains promising performance in generating realistic new intrusion data samples and achieves superior intrusion detection performance. Additionally, the proposed CFLVAE-DNN model outperforms several state-of-the-art data generation and traditional intrusion detection methods. Specifically, the CFLVAE-DNN achieves 88.08% overall intrusion detection accuracy and 3.77% false positive rate. More significantly, it obtains the highest low-frequency attack detection rates for U2R (79.25%) and R2L (67.5%) against all the state-of-the-art algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.