ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Detection of Water pH Using Visible Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Time Automated pH Control within Batch Processes Relying on Raman pH Measurement.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Enhanced Prediction of Soil Carbon via Encoder-Decoder Neural Networks for a Boreal Study Area in Northern Ontario.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
pH is an important parameter for water quality detection. This study proposed a novel calibration regression strategy based on a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) for water pH detection using visible near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy. Two groups of Vis-NIR spectral analysis experiments of water pH detection were employed to evaluate the performance of 1D-CNN. Two conventional multivariate regression calibration methods, including partial least squares (PLS) and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM), were introduced for comparative analysis with 1D-CNN. The successive projections algorithm (SPA) was adopted to select the feature variables. In addition, the learning mechanism of 1D-CNN was interpreted through visual feature maps by convolutional layers. The results showed that the 1D-CNN models obtained the highest prediction accuracy based on full spectra for the two experiments. For the spectrophotometer experiment, the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was 0.7925, and the determination coefficient of prediction (Rp2) was 0.8515. For the grating spectrograph experiment, the RMSEP was 0.5128 and the Rp2 was 0.9273. The convolutional layers could automatically preprocess the spectra and effectively extract the spectra features. Compared with the traditional regression methods, 1D-CNN does not need complex spectra pretreatment and variable selection. Therefore, 1D-CNN is a promising regression approach, with higher prediction accuracy and better modeling convenience for rapid water pH detection using Vis-NIR spectroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.