Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957354›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Design Validation of a Low-Cost EMG Sensor Compared to a Commercial-Based System for Measuring Muscle Activity and Fatigue.

Anthony Bawa, Konstantinos Banitsas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Circular, Wireless Surface-Electromyography Array.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Evaluation of a passive wearable arm ExoNET.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony BawaElectronic and Electrical Engineering Department, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, London UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-4949
Konstantinos BanitsasElectronic and Electrical Engineering Department, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, London UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-3032
Brunel University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) sensors have been used for measuring muscle signals and for diagnosing neuromuscular disease. Available commercial EMG sensor are expensive and not easily available for individuals. The aim of the study is to validate our designed low-cost sensor against a well-known commercial system for measuring muscle activity and fatigue assessment. The evaluation of the designed system was done through a series of dynamic exercises performed by volunteers. Our low-cost EMG sensor and the commercially available system were placed on the vastus lateralis muscle to concurrently record the signal in a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). The signal analysis was done using two validation indicators: Spearman's correlation, and intra-class cross correlation on SPSS 26.0 version. For the muscle fatigue assessment, the root mean square (RMS), mean absolute value (MAV) and mean frequency (MNF) indicators were used. The results at the peak and mean level muscle contraction intensity were computed. The relative agreement for the two systems was excellent at peak level muscle contraction range (ICC 0.74-0.92), average 0.83 and mean level muscle contraction intensity range (ICC 0.65-0.85) with an average of 0.74. The Spearman's correlation average was 0.76 with the range of (0.71-0.85) at peak level contraction, whiles the mean level contraction average was 0.71 at a range of (0.62-0.81). In determining muscle fatigue, the RMS and MAV showed increasing values in the time domain, while the MEF decreased in the frequency domain. Overall, the results indicated a good to excellent agreement of the two systems and confirmed the reliability of our design. The low-cost sensor also proved to be suitable for muscle fatigue assessment. Our designed system can therefore be implemented for rehabilitation, sports science, and ergonomics.

Indexed as

Muscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalElectromyographyHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle ContractionReproducibility of Resultselectromyographyfatigue assessmentlow-cost sensormuscle contraction

Identifiers

PMID35957354
PMCPMC9370927
OpenAlexW4289731835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.