ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Android Spyware Detection Using Machine Learning: A Novel Dataset.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smartphones are an essential part of all aspects of our lives. Socially, politically, and commercially, there is almost complete reliance on smartphones as a communication tool, a source of information, and for entertainment. Rapid developments in the world of information and cyber security have necessitated close attention to the privacy and protection of smartphone data. Spyware detection systems have recently been developed as a promising and encouraging solution for smartphone users' privacy protection. The Android operating system is the most widely used worldwide, making it a significant target for many parties interested in targeting smartphone users' privacy. This paper introduces a novel dataset collected in a realistic environment, obtained through a novel data collection methodology based on a unified activity list. The data are divided into three main classes: the first class represents normal smartphone traffic; the second class represents traffic data for the spyware installation process; finally, the third class represents spyware operation traffic data. The random forest classification algorithm was adopted to validate this dataset and the proposed model. Two methodologies were adopted for data classification: binary-class and multi-class classification. Good results were achieved in terms of accuracy. The overall average accuracy was 79% for the binary-class classification, and 77% for the multi-class classification. In the multi-class approach, the detection accuracy for spyware systems (UMobix, TheWiSPY, MobileSPY, FlexiSPY, and mSPY) was 90%, 83.7%, 69.3%, 69.2%, and 73.4%, respectively; in binary-class classification, the detection accuracy for spyware systems (UMobix, TheWiSPY, MobileSPY, FlexiSPY, and mSPY) was 93.9%, 85.63%, 71%, 72.3%, and 75.96%; respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.