ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Sea Cucumber Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underwater Weight Estimation of Three Sea Cucumber Species in Culture Tanks Using Image Analysis and ArUco Markers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Underwater Target Detection Based on Parallel High-Resolution Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Situ Sea Cucumber Detection across Multiple Underwater Scenes Based on Convolutional Neural Networks and Image Enhancements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional single-shot multiBox detector (SSD) for the recognition process in sea cucumbers has problems, such as an insufficient expression of features, heavy computation, and difficulty in application to embedded platforms. To solve these problems, we proposed an improved algorithm for sea cucumber detection based on the traditional SSD algorithm. MobileNetv1 is selected as the backbone of the SSD algorithm. We increase the feature receptive field by receptive field block (RFB) to increase feature details and location information of small targets. Combined with the attention mechanism, features at different depths are strengthened and irrelevant features are suppressed. The experimental results show that the improved algorithm has better performance than the traditional SSD algorithm. The average precision of the improved algorithm is increased by 5.1%. The improved algorithm is also more robust. Compared with YOLOv4 and the Faster R-CNN algorithm, the performance of this algorithm on the P-R curve is better, indicating that the performance of this algorithm is better. Thus, the improved algorithm can stably detect sea cucumbers in real time and provide reliable feedback information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.