ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Explaining One-Dimensional Convolutional Models in Human Activity Recognition and Biometric Identification Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Neuromuscular Time-Frequency Organization During Sit-to-Walk in Parkinson's Disease: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach Using Surface Electromyography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ErgoReport: A Holistic Posture Assessment Framework Based on Inertial Data and Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Retrieving interpretability to support vector machine regression models in dynamic system identification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Explaining and Visualizing Embeddings of One-Dimensional Convolutional Models in Human Activity Recognition Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to wearables' popularity, human activity recognition (HAR) plays a significant role in people's routines. Many deep learning (DL) approaches have studied HAR to classify human activities. Previous studies employ two HAR validation approaches: subject-dependent (SD) and subject-independent (SI). Using accelerometer data, this paper shows how to generate visual explanations about the trained models' decision making on both HAR and biometric user identification (BUI) tasks and the correlation between them. We adapted gradient-weighted class activation mapping (grad-CAM) to one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNN) architectures to produce visual explanations of HAR and BUI models. Our proposed networks achieved 0.978 and 0.755 accuracy, employing both SD and SI. The proposed BUI network achieved 0.937 average accuracy. We demonstrate that HAR's high performance with SD comes not only from physical activity learning but also from learning an individual's signature, as in BUI models. Our experiments show that CNN focuses on larger signal sections in BUI, while HAR focuses on smaller signal segments. We also use the grad-CAM technique to identify database bias problems, such as signal discontinuities. Combining explainable techniques with deep learning can help models design, avoid results overestimation, find bias problems, and improve generalization capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.