ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Novel Deep-Learning Model Compression Based on Filter-Stripe Group Pruning and Its IoT Application.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- IESSP: Information Extraction-Based Sparse Stripe Pruning Method for Deep Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Nowadays, there is a tradeoff between the deep-learning module-compression ratio and the module accuracy. In this paper, a strategy for refining the pruning quantification and weights based on neural network filters is proposed. Firstly, filters in the neural network were refined into strip-like filter strips. Then, the evaluation of the filter strips was used to refine the partial importance of the filter, cut off the unimportant filter strips and reorganize the remaining filter strips. Finally, the training of the neural network after recombination was quantified to further compress the computational amount of the neural network. The results show that the method can significantly reduce the computational effort of the neural network and compress the number of parameters in the model. Based on experimental results on ResNet56, this method can reduce the number of parameters to 1/4 and the amount of calculation to 1/5, and the loss of model accuracy is only 0.01. On VGG16, the number of parameters is reduced to 1/14, the amount of calculation is reduced to 1/3, and the accuracy loss is 0.5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.