Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35957030›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Control of the Drying Patterns for Complex Colloidal Solutions and Their Applications.

Saebom Lee, Tiara A M, Gyoujin Cho, Jinkee Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. COColloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saebom LeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Tiara A MDepartment of Biophysics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8553-2249
Gyoujin ChoDepartment of Biophysics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Jinkee LeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5590-0549

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Program of Sungkyunkwan University (2021) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uneven deposition at the edges of an evaporating droplet, termed the coffee-ring effect, has been extensively studied during the past few decades to better understand the underlying cause, namely the flow dynamics, and the subsequent patterns formed after drying. The non-uniform evaporation rate across the colloidal droplet hampers the formation of a uniform and homogeneous film in printed electronics, rechargeable batteries, etc., and often causes device failures. This review aims to highlight the diverse range of techniques used to alleviate the coffee-ring effect, from classic methods such as adding chemical additives, applying external sources, and manipulating geometrical configurations to recently developed advancements, specifically using bubbles, humidity, confined systems, etc., which do not involve modification of surface, particle or liquid properties. Each of these methodologies mitigates the edge deposition via multi-body interactions, for example, particle-liquid, particle-particle, particle-solid interfaces and particle-flow interactions. The mechanisms behind each of these approaches help to find methods to inhibit the non-uniform film formation, and the corresponding applications have been discussed together with a critical comparison in detail. This review could pave the way for developing inks and processes to apply in functional coatings and printed electronic devices with improved efficiency and device yield.

Indexed as

coffee-ring effectdeposition patternsevaporationinterfacial flow

Identifiers

PMID35957030
PMCPMC9370329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.