Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956567›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

The Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study.

Ann Carrillo-Marcos, Giuliany Salazar-Correa, Leonor Castro-Ramirez, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, Carlos López-Gurreonero, Hernán Cachay-Criado, Ana Aliaga-Mariñas, Alberto Cornejo-Pinto, Luis Cervantes-Ganoza, César Félix Cayo-Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ann Carrillo-MarcosSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.
Giuliany Salazar-CorreaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.
Leonor Castro-RamirezSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-7074-756X
Marysela Ladera-Castañeda"Grupo de Investigación Salud y Bienestar Global", Faculty of Dentistry and Postgraduate School, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, 15001 Lima, Peru.
Carlos López-GurreoneroSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Científica del Sur, 15067 Lima, Peru.
Hernán Cachay-CriadoSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.
Ana Aliaga-Mariñas"Grupo de Investigación Salud y Bienestar Global", Faculty of Dentistry and Postgraduate School, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, 15001 Lima, Peru.
Alberto Cornejo-PintoSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.
Luis Cervantes-GanozaFaculty of Stomatology, Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, 15084 Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-6750
César Félix Cayo-RojasSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, 15066 Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-7841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the microhardness and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites treated with and without the application of an oxygen-inhibited layer (OIL) and a polishing system. This in vitro experimental study consisted of 72 resin composite blocks divided into three groups: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, and Filtek Bulk Fill. Each resin composite group was further divided into two subgroups: with and without OIL control. Subsequently, surface roughness and microhardness were measured before and after polishing. A t-test was used to compare independent and related measures. For the intergroup comparison of variation before and after polishing, the Kruskal−Wallis test with Bonferroni post hoc was used considering a significance level of p < 0.05. When comparing surface roughness, significant differences were observed between Opus Bulk Fill resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.003) before polishing. The same occurred when comparing Tetric N-Ceram resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.039) after polishing. In addition, the surface roughness of Filtek Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites, with and without OIL control, decreased significantly after polishing (p < 0.001), while surface microhardness significantly increased (p < 0.05), with the exception of Opus Bulk Fill resin with OIL control (p = 0.413). In conclusion, OIL control and polishing significantly improved the surface roughness and surface microhardness of Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites. However, in the case of Opus Bulk Fill resin composite, only its surface roughness was significantly improved.

Indexed as

bulk-fill resincomparative studydental materialsdental polishingdentistryoxygen-inhibited layerresin compositesurface microhardnesssurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID35956567
PMCPMC9370367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.