Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956381›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Effects of Selenium Supplementation in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meire Ellen Pereira, Júlia Vicentin Souza, Maria Eduarda Andrade Galiciolli, Fernanda Sare, Giovanna Scorsin Vieira, Isabeli Lopes Kruk, Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Neuroferroptosis in health and diseases.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meire Ellen PereiraInstituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Rua Silva Jardim 1632, Curitiba 80250-060, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-7125
Júlia Vicentin SouzaFaculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Avenida Iguaçu 333, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Andrade GaliciolliInstituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Rua Silva Jardim 1632, Curitiba 80250-060, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0032-9976
Fernanda SareFaculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Avenida Iguaçu 333, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil.
Giovanna Scorsin VieiraFaculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Avenida Iguaçu 333, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil.
Isabeli Lopes KrukFaculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Avenida Iguaçu 333, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil.
Cláudia Sirlene OliveiraInstituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Rua Silva Jardim 1632, Curitiba 80250-060, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-5316
Faculdade Brasil · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated levels of oxidative stress could cause and aggravate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Selenium (Se) is a trace element with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity with neuroprotective effects. To evaluate the effects of Se supplementation in patients with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through a systematic review and meta-analysis, data were searched and collected from four electronic databases, including clinical trial studies published until December 2020, following the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Rob 2 tool. A total of 1350 scientific papers were collected, and following evaluation 11 papers were included in the systematic review and 6 of these were used in the meta-analysis. Studies that evaluated only Se supplementation observed an improvement in Se levels, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity, and in some cognitive tests in MCI patients; similarly, improvement in Se levels and mini-mental score was also observed in AD patients. Regarding supplementation of Se plus other nutrients, improvement in cognitive tests was observed in both AD and MCI patients. Therefore, Se supplementation is a good alternative for patients with AD and MCI for improving Se levels and GPX activity. More detailed studies are required to further evaluate the effects of Se on the cognitive deficit and oxidative stress associated with AD and MCI.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionSeleniumAntioxidantsDietary SupplementsHumansAntioxidantsSeleniumBrazil nutneurodegenerative diseaseoxidative stressselenium

Identifiers

PMID35956381
PMCPMC9370215
OpenAlexW4292451771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.