Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956380›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Labels Affect Food Choices, but in What Ways?

Swen J Kühne, Ester Reijnen, Gracinda Granja, Rachel S Hansen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swen J KühneSchool of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstrasse 96, P.O. Box 707, CH-8037 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8326-9168
Ester ReijnenSchool of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstrasse 96, P.O. Box 707, CH-8037 Zürich, Switzerland.
Gracinda GranjaSchool of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstrasse 96, P.O. Box 707, CH-8037 Zürich, Switzerland.
Rachel S HansenSchool of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstrasse 96, P.O. Box 707, CH-8037 Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

Suzanne and Hans Biaesch Foundation No number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reduce obesity and thus promote healthy food choices, front-of-pack (FOP) labels have been introduced. Though FOP labels help identify healthy foods, their impact on actual food choices is rather small. A newly developed so-called swipe task was used to investigate whether the type of label used (summary vs. nutrient-specific) had differential effects on different operationalizations of the "healthier choice" measure (e.g., calories and sugar). After learning about the product offerings of a small online store, observers (

Indexed as

Food LabelingFood PreferencesChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorEnergy IntakeHumansNutritive ValueSugarsSugarsaveraging biascaloriefood labelhealthy foodlicensing effectNutri-Scoresugar

Identifiers

PMID35956380
PMCPMC9370702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.