Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956336›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Association of Vitamin D Supplementation with Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yi-Yan Pei, Yu Zhang, Xing-Chen Peng, Zhe-Ran Liu, Ping Xu, Fang Fang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. [Interpretation of the Expert Consensus Statement on the Role of Vitamin D in Metabolic Health].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Yan PeiWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yu ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Xing-Chen PengWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7042-718X
Zhe-Ran LiuWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Ping XuSichuan University Library, Chengdu 610044, China.
Fang FangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNChengdu University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672386National Natural Science Foundation of China 81803104National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundlow vitamin D status has been associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. However, whether vitamin D supplementation would reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events remains unclear. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the mortality and incidence of cardiovascular events. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception until 3 May 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Two authors searched for randomized clinical trials that reported vitamin D supplementation's effect on cardiovascular events outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors conducted independent data extraction. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 41,809 reports; after exclusions, 18 trials with a total of 70,278 participants were eligible for analysis. Vitamin D supplementation was not associated with the mortality of cardiovascular events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.06, I LIMITATION: Cardiovascular events were the secondary outcome in most trials and thus, might be selectively reported.

conclusionIn this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, vitamin D supplementation was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events than no supplementation. These findings do not support the routine use of vitamin D supplementation in general.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsMyocardial InfarctionHumansIncidenceVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminscardiovascular eventsmeta-analysismortalityvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID35956336
PMCPMC9370368
OpenAlexW4289204853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.