Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956298›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

A Comparison of the Impact of Restrictive Diets on the Gastrointestinal Tract of Mice.

András Gregor, Laura Huber, Sandra Auernigg-Haselmaier, Felix Sternberg, Magdalena Billerhart, Andreas Dunkel, Veronika Somoza, Manfred Ogris, Barbara Kofler, Valter D Longo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Interplay between the Gut and Ketogenic Diets in Health and Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Editorial: Ketone bodies: friend or foe?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

András GregorDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-9480
Laura HuberDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sandra Auernigg-HaselmaierDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Felix SternbergDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Biophysics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Magdalena BillerhartLaboratory of Macromolecular Cancer Therapeutics (MMCT), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-8830
Andreas DunkelLeibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-6144
Veronika SomozaLeibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Manfred OgrisLaboratory of Macromolecular Cancer Therapeutics (MMCT), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4576-6961
Barbara KoflerResearch Program for Receptor Biochemistry and Tumor Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-4776
Valter D LongoLongevity Institute, Leonard Davis, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Jürgen KönigDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2184-9372
Kalina DuszkaDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-6090
University of Vienna · ATLeibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich · DEHuman Longevity (United States) · USParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rate of gut inflammatory diseases is growing in modern society. Previously, we showed that caloric restriction (CR) shapes gut microbiota composition and diminishes the expression of inflammatory factors along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The current project aimed to assess whether prominent dietary restrictive approaches, including intermittent fasting (IF), fasting-mimicking diet (FMD), and ketogenic diet (KD) have a similar effect as CR. We sought to verify which of the restrictive dietary approaches is the most potent and if the molecular pathways responsible for the impact of the diets overlap. We characterized the impact of the diets in the context of several dietary restriction-related parameters, including immune status in the GI tract; microbiota and its metabolites; bile acids (BAs); gut morphology; as well as autophagy-, mitochondria-, and energy restriction-related parameters. The effects of the various diets are very similar, particularly between CR, IF, and FMD. The occurrence of a 50 kDa truncated form of occludin, the composition of the microbiota, and BAs distinguished KD from the other diets. Based on the results, we were able to provide a comprehensive picture of the impact of restrictive diets on the gut, indicating that restrictive protocols aimed at improving gut health may be interchangeable.

Indexed as

Diet, KetogenicGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsDietFastingGastrointestinal TractMicecaloric restrictionfastinggastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID35956298
PMCPMC9370610
OpenAlexW4289205471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.