Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956241›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Radiologic Evaluation of Uterine Vasculature of Uterus Transplant Living Donor Candidates: DUETS Classification.

Jakub Kristek, Liza Johannesson, Matthew Paul Clemons, Dana Kautznerova, Jaroslav Chlupac, Jiri Fronek, Giuliano Testa, Gregory dePrisco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakub KristekDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3758-2273
Liza JohannessonAnnette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, 3410 Worth St Ste 950, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-3811
Matthew Paul ClemonsDepartment of Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
Dana KautznerovaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav ChlupacDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-6105
Jiri FronekDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2379-3886
Giuliano TestaAnnette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, 3410 Worth St Ste 950, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
Gregory dePriscoDepartment of Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
Baylor University Medical Center · USCharles University · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterus transplantation is a treatment solution for women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility. As much as 19.5% of uterus-transplanted patients underwent urgent graft hysterectomy due to thrombosis/hypoperfusion. The necessity to identify candidates with high-quality uterine vasculature is paramount. We retrospectively evaluated and compared the imaging results with actual vascular findings from the back table. In this article, we present a novel radiologic grading scale (DUETS classification) for evaluating both uterine arteries and veins concerning their suitability for uterus procurement and transplantation. This classification defines several criteria for arteries (caliber, tapering, atherosclerosis, tortuosity, segment, take-off, and course) and veins (caliber, tapering, plethora, fenestrations, duplication/multiplicity, dominant route of venous drainage, radiologist's confidence with imaging and assessment). In conclusion, magnetic resonance angiography can provide reliable information on uterine venous characteristics if performed consistently according to a well-established protocol and assessed by a dedicated radiologist. The caliber of uterine arteries seems to be inversely related to the time passed since the last delivery. We recommend that the radiologist comments on the reliability and confidence of the imaging study. It cannot be over-emphasized that the most crucial aspect of surgical imaging is the necessity of high-quality communication between a surgeon and a radiologist.

Indexed as

blood supplycomputed tomography angiographydiagnostic imagingdonor selectionmagnetic resonance angiographytransplantationuterus

Identifiers

PMID35956241
PMCPMC9369657
OpenAlexW4291818669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.