Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956144›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Analysis of Key Clinical Variables and Radiological Manifestations Associated with the Treatment Response of Patients with Brain Metastases to Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Peng Du, Hongyi Chen, Li Shen, Xiao Liu, Jiawei Chen, Xuefan Wu, Tonggang Yu, Daoying Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng DuDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6970-1329
Hongyi ChenAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Li ShenDepartment of Radiology, Jiahui International Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.
Xiao LiuSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Jiawei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xuefan WuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Gamma Hospital, Shanghai 200235, China.
Tonggang YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Gamma Hospital, Shanghai 200235, China.
Daoying GengDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.

Funding

Clinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR3020AGreater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University 21618Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 20511101100the National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFC0120602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered a promising treatment for brain metastases (BM) with better healing efficacy, relatively faster treatment time, and lower neurotoxicity, which can achieve local control rates above 70%. Although SRS improves the local control of BM, this may not translate into improvements in survival time. Thus, screening out the key factors influencing the treatment response to SRS, instead of the survival time following SRS, might be of more significance. This may assist doctors when making adjustments to treatment strategies for patients with BM.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of 696 patients with BM who were treated with SRS at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between June 2015 and February 2020. According to the patients' treatment response to SRS, the patients were divided into an improved group (IG) and a progressive group (PG). The clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed pre- and post-treatment were collected for the two groups. Five clinical variables (gender, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor type, and extracranial lesion control) and seven radiological manifestations (location, number, volume, maximum diameter, edema index (EI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence signal, and enhanced pattern) were selected and compared. A stepwise regression analysis was performed in order to obtain the best prediction effect of a group of variables and their regression coefficients, and finally to build an SRS treatment response scoring model based on the coefficients. The performance of the model was evaluated by calculating the AUC and performing the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

resultsA total of 323 patients were enrolled in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 209 patients in the IG and 114 patients in the PG. In the Chi-square test and

conclusionsKPS, extracranial lesion control, tumor volume, and EI had a certain correlation with the treatment response to SRS. Scoring models that are based on these variables can accurately predict the treatment response of patients with BM to SRS, thereby assisting doctors to make an appropriate first treatment strategy for patients with BM to a certain degree.

Indexed as

brain metastasesclinical variablesedema indexradiological manifestationsstereotactic radiosurgerytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID35956144
PMCPMC9369562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.