Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956033›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy.

Charles Lombard, Pierre Gillet, Edouard Germain, Fatma Boubaker, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Romain Gillet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles LombardGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1879-3518
Pierre GilletUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0598-7508
Edouard GermainGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-7894
Fatma BoubakerGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Alain BlumGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Pedro Augusto Gondim TeixeiraGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-9385
Romain GilletGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip arthroplasty (HA) is a frequently used procedure with high success rates, but 7% to 27% of the patients complain of persistent postsurgical pain 1 to 4 years post-operation. HA complications depend on the post-operative delay, the type of material used, the patient's characteristics, and the surgical approach. Radiographs are still the first imaging modality used for routine follow-up, in asymptomatic and painful cases. CT and MRI used to suffer from metallic artifacts but are nowadays central in HA complications diagnosis, both having their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging workup for HA complication diagnosis, which may have an impact on patient management. After a brief reminder about the different types of prostheses, this article reviews their normal and pathologic appearance, according to each imaging modality, keeping in mind that few abnormalities might be present, not anyone requiring treatment, depending on the clinical scenario. A diagnostic imaging workup is also discussed, to aid the therapist in his imaging studies prescription and the radiologist in their practical aspects.

Indexed as

arthroplastyCThiplooseningMRI

Identifiers

PMID35956033
PMCPMC9369831
OpenAlexW4289176761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.