ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
MSProDiscuss™ Clinical Decision Support Tool for Identifying Multiple Sclerosis Progression.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Acceptability and Utility of a Web-Based Patient-Completed Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Digital Representation of Patients as Medical Digital Twins: Data-Centric Viewpoint.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Scoping review of clinical decision support systems for multiple sclerosis management: Leveraging information technology and massive health data.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- A Clinical Care Algorithm for Detecting Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: RetratEMos Project.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Faces of "Too Late"-A Surprisingly Progressive Cohort of "Stable" Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Building digital patient pathways for the management and treatment of multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Thresholds in Differentiating Clinical Outcomes in a Real-World Cohort of Treatment-Naïve Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Disease Activity and Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Evidences and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes the rationale for the development of the MSProDiscuss™ clinical decision support (CDS) tool, its development, and insights into how it can help neurologists improve care for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a progressive disease characterized by heterogeneous symptoms and variable disease course. There is growing consensus that MS exists on a continuum, with overlap between relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive phenotypes. Evidence demonstrates that neuroaxonal loss occurs from the outset, that progression can occur independent of relapse activity, and that continuous underlying pathological processes may not be reflected by inflammatory activity indicative of the patient's immune response. Early intervention can benefit patients, and there is a need for a tool that assists physicians in rapidly identifying subtle signs of MS progression. MSProDiscuss, developed with physicians and patients, facilitates a structured approach to patient consultations. It analyzes multidimensional data via an algorithm to estimate the likelihood of progression (the MSProDiscuss score), the contribution of various symptoms, and the impact of symptoms on daily living, enabling a more personalized approach to treatment and disease management. Data from CDS tools such as MSProDiscuss offer new insights into disease course and facilitate informed decision-making and a holistic approach to MS patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.