Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955851›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Molecular Subtyping of Invasive Breast Cancer Using a PAM50-Based Multigene Expression Test-Comparison with Molecular-Like Subtyping by Tumor Grade/Immunohistochemistry and Influence on Oncologist's Decision on Systemic Therapy in a Real-World Setting.

Ramona Erber, Miriam Angeloni, Robert Stöhr, Michael P Lux, Daniel Ulbrich-Gebauer, Enrico Pelz, Agnes Bankfalvi, Kurt W Schmid, Robert F H Walter, Martina Vetter and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramona ErberInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0315-1229
Miriam AngeloniInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-6305
Robert StöhrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Michael P LuxKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Frauen Und Kinderklinik St. Louise, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-2178
Daniel Ulbrich-GebauerInstitute of Pathology Viersen, 41747 Viersen, Germany.
Enrico PelzInstitute of Pathology Viersen, 41747 Viersen, Germany.
Agnes BankfalviInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Kurt W SchmidInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Robert F H WalterInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Martina VetterDepartment of Gynecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Christoph ThomssenDepartment of Gynecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Doris MayrInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilian University (LMU), 80337 München, Germany.
Frederick KlauschenInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilian University (LMU), 80337 München, Germany.
Peter SinnInstitute of Pathology, University Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl SotlarInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilian University (LMU), 80337 München, Germany.
Katharina SteringInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Albrecht StenzingerMolekularpathologisches Zentrum, Pathologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Marius WunderleComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Peter A FaschingComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-8471
Matthias W BeckmannComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Oliver HoffmannKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Rainer KimmigKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9744-7372
Rachel WuerstleinBreast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Fulvia FerrazziInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-4638
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinik für Frauenheilkunde · DELVR-Klinik für Orthopädie Viersen · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DERuhrlandklinik · DESt. Josef Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In intermediate risk hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative breast cancer (BC), the decision regarding adjuvant chemotherapy might be facilitated by multigene expression tests. In all, 142 intermediate risk BCs were investigated using the PAM50-based multigene expression test Prosigna® in a prospective multicentric study. In 119/142 cases, Prosigna® molecular subtyping was compared with local and two central (C1 and C6) molecular-like subtypes relying on both immunohistochemistry (IHC; HRs, HER2, Ki-67) and IHC + tumor grade (IHC+G) subtyping. According to local IHC, 35.4% were Luminal A-like and 64.6% Luminal B-like subtypes (local IHC+G subtype: 31.9% Luminal A-like; 68.1% Luminal B-like). In contrast to local and C1 subtyping, C6 classified >2/3 of cases as Luminal A-like. Pairwise agreement between Prosigna® subtyping and molecular-like subtypes was fair to moderate depending on molecular-like subtyping method and center. The best agreement was observed between Prosigna® (53.8% Luminal A; 44.5% Luminal B) and C1 surrogate subtyping (Cohen’s kappa = 0.455). Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested to 44.2% and 88.6% of Prosigna® Luminal A and Luminal B cases, respectively. Out of all Luminal A-like cases (locally IHC/IHC+G subtyping), adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended if Prosigna® testing classified as Prosigna® Luminal A at high / intermediate risk or upgraded to Prosigna® Luminal B.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOncologistsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancerchemotherapyIHCimmunohistochemistrymultigene expression analysisPAM50Prosignatumor grade

Identifiers

PMID35955851
PMCPMC9368794
OpenAlexW4290504152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.