Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955817›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-Tester: A Web Service That Unequivocally Estimates the Impact of Proximal Promoter Mutations on Plant Gene Expression.

Dmitry Rasskazov, Irina Chadaeva, Ekaterina Sharypova, Karina Zolotareva, Bato Khandaev, Petr Ponomarenko, Nikolay Podkolodnyy, Natalya Tverdokhleb, Oleg Vishnevsky, Anton Bogomolov and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Developmental Biology: Computational and Experimental Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Research Topics of the Bioinformatics of Gene Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dmitry RasskazovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Irina ChadaevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-5441
Ekaterina SharypovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Karina ZolotarevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Bato KhandaevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Petr PonomarenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nikolay PodkolodnyyInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Natalya TverdokhlebInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Oleg VishnevskyInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anton BogomolovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Olga PodkolodnayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ludmila SavinkovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Elena ZemlyanskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vadimir GolubyatnikovSobolev Institute of Mathematics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nikolay KolchanovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Mikhail PonomarenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1663-318X

Funding

Russian Government FWNR-2022-0020Russian Government Russian Federal Science and Technology Program for the Development of Genetic TechnologiesRussian Science Foundation 20-14-00140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic targeted optimization of plant promoters is becoming a part of progress in mainstream postgenomic agriculture along with hybridization of cultivated plants with wild congeners, as well as marker-assisted breeding. Therefore, here, for the first time, we compiled all the experimental data-on mutational effects in plant proximal promoters on gene expression-that we could find in PubMed. Some of these datasets cast doubt on both the existence and the uniqueness of the sought solution, which could unequivocally estimate effects of proximal promoter mutation on gene expression when plants are grown under various environmental conditions during their development. This means that the inverse problem under study is ill-posed. Furthermore, we found experimental data on in vitro interchangeability of plant and human TATA-binding proteins allowing the application of Tikhonov's regularization, making this problem well-posed. Within these frameworks, we created our Web service Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-tester and then determined the limits of its applicability using those data that cast doubt on both the existence and the uniqueness of the sought solution. We confirmed that the effects (of proximal promoter mutations on gene expression) predicted by Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-tester correlate statistically significantly with all the experimental data under study. Lastly, we exemplified an application of Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-tester to agriculturally valuable mutations in plant promoters.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantTranscription, GeneticGene ExpressionHumansMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticTATA Boxcorrelationdevelopmentenvironmental exposureexpressiongenemarker-assisted breedingmutationplantplant hybridpredictionpromoterTATA-binding proteinTATA boxverificationWeb service

Identifiers

PMID35955817
PMCPMC9369029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.