ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
An Extensive Study of Phenol Red Thread as a Novel Non-Invasive Tear Sampling Technique for Proteomics Studies: Comparison with Two Commonly Used Methods.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcending genome-wide association studies to create useful multi-omic views of glaucoma.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Nanovesicles derived from protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium officinal enhance corneal epithelial repair and reduce inflammation in dry eye disease models.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tear samples are considered in recent publications as easily, noninvasively collectible information sources for precision medicine. Their complex composition may aid the identification of biomarkers and the monitoring of the effectiveness of treatments for the eye and systemic diseases. Sample collection and processing are key steps in any analytical method, especially if subtle personal differences need to be detected. In this work, we evaluate the usability of a novel sample collection technique for human tear samples using phenol red threads (cotton thread treated with the pH indicator phenol red), which are efficiently used to measure tear volume in clinical diagnosis. The low invasiveness and low discomfort to the patients have already been demonstrated, but their applicability for proteomic sample collection has not yet been compared to other methods. We have shown, using various statistical approaches, the qualitative and quantitative differences in proteomic samples collected with this novel and two traditional methods using either glass capillaries or Schirmer's paper strips. In all parameters studied, the phenol red threads proved to be equally or even more suitable than traditional methods. Based on detectability using different sampling methods, we have classified proteins in tear samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.