The Biochemical Mechanism of Fork Regression in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes-A Single Molecule Comparison.

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview

In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

The Inhibitory Effects and Cytotoxic Activities of the Stem Extract ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
Article
Looking at Biomolecular Interactions through the Lens of Correlated Fluorescence Microscopy and Optical Tweezers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
Review
The Inhibitory Effects and Cytotoxic Activities of the Stem Extract ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piero R BiancoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6025, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2974-7952

Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Insight into the mechanism of action of the SSB interactomeR01GM144414 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYUBCHENKO, YURI L · 2022 to 2025

$1.5M

NIGMS NIH HHS GM144414 and GM100156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144414

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rescue of stalled DNA replication forks is essential for cell viability. Impeded but still intact forks can be rescued by atypical DNA helicases in a reaction known as fork regression. This reaction has been studied at the single-molecule level using the

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesEscherichia coliEukaryotaDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA repairDNA replicationfork regressionfork reversalHARPRecGRPASMARCAL1SSB proteinstalled replication fork

Identifiers

PMID35955746

DOI10.3390/ijms23158613

PMCPMC9368896

OpenAlexW4289711448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.