Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955654›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Proteomics Evidence of a Systemic Response to Desiccation in the Resurrection Plant

Petko Mladenov, Diana Zasheva, Sébastien Planchon, Céline C Leclercq, Denis Falconet, Lucas Moyet, Sabine Brugière, Daniela Moyankova, Magdalena Tchorbadjieva, Myriam Ferro and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Main Functions of Plastids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Protein Changes in Shade and SunPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Petko MladenovAgrobioinstitute, Agricultural Academy Bulgaria, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Diana ZashevaInstitute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Sébastien PlanchonEnvironmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-0574
Céline C LeclercqEnvironmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-4591
Denis FalconetLaboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, CEA, 38054 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-1182
Lucas MoyetLaboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, CEA, 38054 Grenoble, France.
Sabine BrugièreLaboratoire de Biologie à Grande Echelle, Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant, CEA, Université Grenoble Alpes INSERM, 38054 Grenoble, France.
Daniela MoyankovaAgrobioinstitute, Agricultural Academy Bulgaria, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4020-1918
Magdalena TchorbadjievaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Myriam FerroLaboratoire de Biologie à Grande Echelle, Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant, CEA, Université Grenoble Alpes INSERM, 38054 Grenoble, France.
Norbert RollandLaboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, CEA, 38054 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-6636
Jenny RenautEnvironmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-0450-3866
Dimitar DjilianovAgrobioinstitute, Agricultural Academy Bulgaria, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-8033
Xin DengKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.

Funding

1) The Fonds National de la Recherche, Luxembourg SMARTWALL C15/SR/102405502) CAS PRESIDENT'S INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INITIATIVE 2021PB01013) National Key R&D program of China 2021YFE01026004) Bulgarian Science Fund KP06-H-41-IP-Kitai
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global warming and drought stress are expected to have a negative impact on agricultural productivity. Desiccation-tolerant species, which are able to tolerate the almost complete desiccation of their vegetative tissues, are appropriate models to study extreme drought tolerance and identify novel approaches to improve the resistance of crops to drought stress. In the present study, to better understand what makes resurrection plants extremely tolerant to drought, we performed transmission electron microscopy and integrative large-scale proteomics, including organellar and phosphorylation proteomics, and combined these investigations with previously published transcriptomic and metabolomics data from the resurrection plant

Indexed as

CraterostigmaLamialesDesiccationDroughtsProteomicsdehydrindrought stressproteomicsresurrection plantsubcellular fractionationsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35955654
PMCPMC9369045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.