Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955578›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Reporter Genes for Brain Imaging Using MRI, SPECT and PET.

Tianxin Gao, Pei Wang, Teng Gong, Ying Zhou, Ancong Wang, Xiaoying Tang, Xiaolei Song, Yingwei Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimization of CEST MRI Reporter Protein Design Using Cation-Pi Networks.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. International journal of stem cells · 2023
    Review
  8. PET reporter systems for the brain.Trends in neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Multifunctional Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Multiple Cell Cultures for MRI Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianxin GaoSchool of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Pei WangSchool of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Teng GongCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Ying ZhouSchool of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Ancong WangSchool of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1418-4694
Xiaoying TangSchool of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiaolei SongCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-1574
Yingwei FanSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4535-3451

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901907National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172112the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2021CX11018the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities LY2022-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of molecular imaging technologies for brain imaging can not only play an important supporting role in disease diagnosis and treatment but can also be used to deeply study brain functions. Recently, with the support of reporter gene technology, optical imaging has achieved a breakthrough in brain function studies at the molecular level. Reporter gene technology based on traditional clinical imaging modalities is also expanding. By benefiting from the deeper imaging depths and wider imaging ranges now possible, these methods have led to breakthroughs in preclinical and clinical research. This article focuses on the applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) reporter gene technologies for use in brain imaging. The tracking of cell therapies and gene therapies is the most successful and widely used application of these techniques. Meanwhile, breakthroughs have been achieved in the research and development of reporter genes and their imaging probe pairs with respect to brain function research. This paper introduces the imaging principles and classifications of the reporter gene technologies of these imaging modalities, lists the relevant brain imaging applications, reviews their characteristics, and discusses the opportunities and challenges faced by clinical imaging modalities based on reporter gene technology. The conclusion is provided in the last section.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBrainGenes, ReporterMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photonbrain imagingMRIradionuclide imagingreporter gene

Identifiers

PMID35955578
PMCPMC9368793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.