ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials-Design Principles and Their Implementation.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Methodological Approach to Assessing Biocompatibility: 3D Printing and Subcutaneous Implantation in Rats.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials: Integrated Translational Ecosystems, Process-Structure-Property Interactions and Emerging Paradigms for Next-Generation Biomedical Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Synchronizing degradation with regeneration: a model-driven framework for designing biodegradable biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Multiscale Engineered Heterogeneous Hydrogel Composites for Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology for Biomedical Applications: Synthesis and Properties of Ti-Based Nanocomposites.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Electrically conductive biopolymer-based hydrogels and fibrous materials fabricated using 3D printing and electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Lattice Structures in Additive Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Systematic Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Antioxidant scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration: recent advances and challenges.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Reviewing Additive Manufacturing Techniques: Material Trends and Weight Optimization Possibilities Through Innovative Printing Patterns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Global Advancements in Bioactive Material Manufacturing for Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Study.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Fabrication of Gelatin-Nano Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Enhanced Control of Pore Size Distribution and Osteogenic Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Macromolecular bioscience · 2024Article
- High-Throughput 3D-Printed Model of the Feto-Maternal Interface for the Discovery and Development of Preterm Birth Therapies.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Orthopedic meta-implants.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Finite element analysis andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- A Review of the Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Microstructural and mechanical behaviours of Y-TZP prepared via slip-casting and fused deposition modelling (FDM).Heliyon · 2023Article
- Emerging Strategies for the Biofabrication of Multilayer Composite Amniotic Membranes for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterials.ACS applied bio materials · 2023Review
- Article
- The Dual Effect of 3D-Printed Biological Scaffolds Composed of Diverse Biomaterials in the Treatment of Bone Tumors.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM, also known as 3D printing) is an advanced manufacturing technique that has enabled progress in the design and fabrication of customised or patient-specific (meta-)biomaterials and biomedical devices (e.g., implants, prosthetics, and orthotics) with complex internal microstructures and tuneable properties. In the past few decades, several design guidelines have been proposed for creating porous lattice structures, particularly for biomedical applications. Meanwhile, the capabilities of AM to fabricate a wide range of biomaterials, including metals and their alloys, polymers, and ceramics, have been exploited, offering unprecedented benefits to medical professionals and patients alike. In this review article, we provide an overview of the design principles that have been developed and used for the AM of biomaterials as well as those dealing with three major categories of biomaterials, i.e., metals (and their alloys), polymers, and ceramics. The design strategies can be categorised as: library-based design, topology optimisation, bio-inspired design, and meta-biomaterials. Recent developments related to the biomedical applications and fabrication methods of AM aimed at enhancing the quality of final 3D-printed biomaterials and improving their physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics are also highlighted. Finally, examples of 3D-printed biomaterials with tuned properties and functionalities are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.