Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955381›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Aluminum Perlite Syntactic Foams.

György Thalmaier, Niculina Argentina Sechel, Alexandra Csapai, Catalin Ovidiu Popa, Gabriel Batin, Andras Gábora, Tamas Mankovits, Ioan Vida-Simiti

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

György ThalmaierDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-6110
Niculina Argentina SechelDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandra CsapaiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Catalin Ovidiu PopaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Gabriel BatinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andras GáboraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary.
Tamas MankovitsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary.
Ioan Vida-SimitiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Ave., 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-0652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the usage of spark plasma sintering (SPS) as a method to obtain aluminum-expanded perlite syntactic foams with high porosity. In the test samples, fine aluminum powder with flaky shape particles was used as matrix material and natural, inorganic, granular, expanded perlite was used as a space holder to ensure high porosity (35−57%) and uniform structure. SPS was used to consolidate the specimens. The structures were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and compression tests. Energy absorption (W~7.49 MJ/m3) and energy absorption efficiency (EW < 90%) were also determined.

Indexed as

compression testsexpanded perlitespark plasma sinteringsyntactic foams

Identifiers

PMID35955381
PMCPMC9370033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.