Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954960›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Uptake of Voluntary Occupational Health Care-Assessments of German Occupational Health Physicians and Employees.

Martina Michaelis, Christine Preiser, Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, Nicole Blomberg, Monika A Rieger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martina MichaelisInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Christine PreiserInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5549-6336
Susanne Voelter-MahlknechtInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Nicole BlombergInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-3663
University of Tübingen · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEResearch Centre for Applied System Safety and Industrial Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers' health surveillance is considered essential for employees' health and protection against hazardous working conditions. It is one part of occupational health care and thus one of four pillars of holistic workplace health management. In Germany, employers are obliged to provide mandatory and voluntary occupational health care (OHC) to employees, dependent on the defined occupational hazards. However, employees are not obliged to make use of voluntary OHC. No empirical information is available about the uptake of voluntary OHC by employees and the influencing factors in Germany. Thus, we carried out an explorative multi-perspective study with qualitative and quantitative elements to get insights from the view of occupational health physicians (OHPs) and employees. We conducted a survey among OHPs based on prior statements from two focus group discussions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect enablers and barriers regarding employee uptake of the offered voluntary OHC. We used extended qualitative methods among employees instead of an analogous survey. In total, 460 OHPs participated in the survey (response rate 29.1%), and 25 employees took part in interviews. Most of the employees had not heard the term voluntary OHC before, and only a few remembered respective occupational health care after explanatory request. In total, 78% of the OHPs assessed that employees always/mostly take up voluntary OHC. The most important attributed reason for non-uptake was that employees see no need for occupational health care when they feel healthy. The most important enabler for the perceived high uptake of voluntary OHC in the regression analysis was a positive attitude of the OHP toward voluntary OHC. While OHPs perceived that voluntary OHC was accepted by a majority of employees, this was not confirmed by the interviews with selected employees. This could indicate that the OHP respondents overestimated the amount of uptake. Since it became clear that employees are often unfamiliar with the terminology itself, we see a need for more and better information regarding the objectives and content of occupational health care to improve this important pillar of workplace health management.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthOccupational Health PhysiciansOccupational Health ServicesGermanyHumansWorkplaceemployeesinterviewsmulti-perspective studyoccupational health careoccupational health physicianspredictors for uptakesurveyuptake of occupational health careworkers’ health surveillanceworkplace health management

Identifiers

PMID35954960
PMCPMC9367937
OpenAlexW4289997289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.