Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954824›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fahrin Ramadan Andiwijaya, Calum Davey, Khaoula Bessame, Abdourahmane Ndong, Hannah Kuper

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence-based Interventions for Cancer Screening Access among People with Physical and/or Sensory Disability: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Vaccines · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. To eliminate cervical cancer in Canada, nationwide funding of self-sampling for human papillomavirus is needed.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fahrin Ramadan AndiwijayaDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mataram, Mataram 83125, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-7915-7902
Calum DaveyInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4283-3030
Khaoula BessameWest Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Watford WD18 0HB, UK.
Abdourahmane NdongFaculty of Health Sciences, Gaston Berger University of Saint-Louis, Saint-Louis 234, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-1375
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%,

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPersons with DisabilitiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass Screeningcancerdisabilitymammographypap smearscreening

Identifiers

PMID35954824
PMCPMC9368105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.