Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954811›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Stigma, Discrimination and Disclosure of the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in the Workplace: A Systematic Review.

Bruno Kusznir Vitturi, Alborz Rahmani, Guglielmo Dini, Alfredo Montecucco, Nicoletta Debarbieri, Paolo Bandiera, Michela Ponzio, Mario Alberto Battaglia, Benedetta Persechino, Matilde Inglese and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bruno Kusznir VitturiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alborz RahmaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-046X
Guglielmo DiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0497-4879
Alfredo MontecuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Nicoletta DebarbieriOccupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Paolo BandieraItalian Multiple Sclerosis Association (AISM), 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Michela PonzioScientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Mario Alberto BattagliaScientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Benedetta PersechinoItalian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00078 Rome, Italy.
Matilde IngleseDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Paolo DurandoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-5176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to describe and analyze the stigma, discrimination and the disclosure of the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the workplace. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320437). We systematically searched four scientific databases with key search terms. We included any original peer-reviewed articles reporting the stigma or discrimination experienced at work due to MS or the disclosure of the diagnosis of MS in the workplace. No time limits were set for the search. An appraisal of the individual study quality was performed with the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Overall, 26 studies were deemed to fulfil all the eligibility criteria. The total number of participants in this review was 9571. The prevalence of people with MS who experience some degree of stigma in the workplace can be as high as 79.2%. Those who report greater feelings of discrimination are more likely to be unemployed. The prevalence of employers' and co-workers' awareness of the diagnosis varies from 31.7 to 90.2%. The main reason for non-disclosure is the fear of being discriminated against. The psychosocial work environment needs to be taken into consideration as part of public and individual policies to promote the health of patients with MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisDisclosureHumansSocial StigmaUnemploymentWorkplacedemyelinating diseasediscriminationjobmultiple sclerosisneurologyoccupational medicinestigmawork

Identifiers

PMID35954811
PMCPMC9367867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.