Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954733›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Development and Validation of a New Measure of Work Annoyance Using a Psychometric Network Approach.

Nicola Magnavita, Carlo Chiorri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Workplace Health Promotion Embedded in Medical Surveillance: The Italian Way to Total Worker Health Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola MagnavitaPostgraduate School of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-7344
Carlo ChiorriDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1640-3897
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing measures of the impact of job characteristics on workers' well-being do not directly assess the extent to which such characteristics (e.g., opportunity to learn new skills) are perceived as positive or negative. We developed a measure, the Work Annoyance Scale (WAS), of the level of annoyance that workers feel about certain aspects of the job and evaluated its psychometric properties. Using archival data from two cohorts (

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansItalyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesjob attitudework abilitywork annoyancework engagementwork strain

Identifiers

PMID35954733
PMCPMC9368152
OpenAlexW4289133962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.