Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954721›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Assessing Recent Efforts to Improve Organization of Cancer Care in Poland: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?

Anna Sagan, Iwona Kowalska-Bobko, Małgorzata Gałązka-Sobotka, Tomasz Holecki, Adam Maciejczyk, Martin McKee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna SaganEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9304-8286
Iwona Kowalska-BobkoInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University, 31-067 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3728-2323
Małgorzata Gałązka-SobotkaInstitute of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Lazarski University, 02-662 Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz HoleckiDepartment of Economic and Management in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences in Bytom, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Adam MaciejczykLower Silesian Oncology Centre, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland.
Martin McKeeEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poland has implemented two major organizational changes in recent years to improve cancer care. In 2015, a dedicated 'fast pathway' to diagnostics and treatment was implemented for patients suspected of having cancer. In 2019, the National Oncology Network began pilots in four regions of care pathways for cancer at five sites. Neither has been evaluated-no baseline information was collected, and what assessments were undertaken were limited to process measures. While the 2019 initiative was at least piloted, a national rollout has been announced even while the pilot is still ongoing and when concerns about certain aspects of the model have been raised. Given that cancer is the second largest cause of death in Poland and that cancer outcomes are worse compared to Western European averages, there is a particular need to ensure that models of care are informed by the evidence and adapted to the realities of the Polish healthcare system.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyOrganizationsPolandcancer carecoordinationhealthcareintegrated carePoland

Identifiers

PMID35954721
PMCPMC9368127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.