Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954691›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effectiveness of China's Protected Areas in Mitigating Human Activity Pressure.

Jian Chen, Hong Shi, Xin Wang, Yiduo Zhang, Zihan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jian ChenSchool of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Hong ShiSchool of Tourism and Historical Culture, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xin WangSchool of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yiduo ZhangSchool of Tourism and Historical Culture, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zihan ZhangSchool of Tourism and Historical Culture, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global protected areas are the key factor in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, few studies use human activity pressure to assess the effectiveness of protected areas. This study constructed a human activity pressure index to assess the effectiveness of China's protected areas, and predicted the change trend in 2050 under the SSP scenarios. The results are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the pressure of human activities in 75.15% of China's protected areas is on the rise, accounting for 37.98% of the total area of the reserves. (2) China's protected areas can relieve the pressure of human activities by 1.37%, and there are regional differences in the effectiveness. (3) Under the SSP scenarios, the protected areas can alleviate the effect of the pressure of the population well. These results can provide a systematic and scientific reference for the planning, construction, evaluation and management of global protected areas.

Indexed as

EcosystemHuman ActivitiesBiodiversityChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansChinaeffectivenesshuman activity pressureprotected areasSSP scenarios

Identifiers

PMID35954691
PMCPMC9368507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.