Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review.

Risto Nikunlaakso, Kirsikka Selander, Elina Weiste, Eveliina Korkiakangas, Maria Paavolainen, Tiina Koivisto, Jaana Laitinen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Strategies to mitigate moral distress as reported by eldercare professionals.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Risto NikunlaaksoFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8217-5108
Kirsikka SelanderFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5218-4660
Elina WeisteFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-6004
Eveliina KorkiakangasFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Maria PaavolainenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Tiina KoivistoFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Jaana LaitinenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aging of the population in Western countries will increase the use of social and health services in the future. Employees in eldercare are at risk for experiencing moral distress, which is associated with poor work ability. The causes and consequences of moral distress among eldercare workers remain undiscovered. This scoping review investigates the existing studies of causes and consequences of moral distress among eldercare workers. Additionally, it seeks evidence of interventions designed to mitigate moral distress in eldercare workers. Fourteen studies were included in the final review. Most of the included studies were qualitative, aiming to increase understanding of morally challenging situations in eldercare. We also found quantitative studies with cross-sectional designs and small sample sizes. Thus, no reliable evidence of causal effects between moral distress and worker wellbeing in eldercare was found. We found no interventions undertaken to resolve moral distress among eldercare workers, either. More research is needed on the causes and consequences of moral distress and on interventions to mitigate moral distress among eldercare workers. This is of utmost importance to increase the attractiveness of eldercare as a workplace and to improve eldercare workers' ability to work and sustain long working careers.

Indexed as

MoralsWorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnaireseldercareinterventionsmoral distressscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35954662
PMCPMC9368675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.