Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954638›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Simulation of Land Use Pattern Based on Land Ecological Security: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China.

Lesong Zhao, Guangsheng Liu, Chunlong Xian, Jiaqi Nie, Yao Xiao, Zhigang Zhou, Xiting Li, Hongmei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lesong ZhaoSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Guangsheng LiuSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chunlong XianSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Jiaqi NieSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yao XiaoSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhigang ZhouSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xiting LiSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hongmei WangSchool of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of rapid urbanization has intensified the conversion of different land use types, resulting in a substantial loss of ecological land and ecological security being threatened. In the context of China's vigorous advocacy of an ecological civilization, it is important to explore future land use patterns under ecological security constraints to promote sustainable development. The insufficient consideration of land ecological security in existing land use pattern simulation studies makes it difficult to effectively promote improvement in the ecological security level. Therefore, we developed a land use simulation framework that integrates land ecological security. Taking the sustainable development of land ecosystems as the core, the land ecological security index (LESI) and ecological zoning (EZ) were determined by the pressure-state-response (PSR) model and the catastrophe progression method (CPM). Natural development (ND) and ecological protection (EP) scenarios were then constructed taking the LESI and EZ into consideration. The CA-Markov model was used to simulate the land use pattern of Guangzhou for 2030 under the two scenarios. The results showed that (1) the study area was divided into four categories: ecological core zone, ecological buffer zone, ecological optimization zone, and urban development zone, with area shares of 37.53%, 31.14%, 16.96%, and 14.37%, respectively. (2) In both scenarios, the construction land around the towns showed outward expansion; compared with the ND scenario, the construction land in the EP scenario decreased by 369.10 km

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemChinaCitiesUrbanizationCA–Markov modelGuangzhouland ecological securityland use patternscenario simulation

Identifiers

PMID35954638
PMCPMC9367798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.